<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An exception to the rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gwdiscourse.com/2010/01/24/an-exception-to-the-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gwdiscourse.com/2010/01/24/an-exception-to-the-rule/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 14:07:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Pleasant Myth? &#171; GW Discourse</title>
		<link>http://gwdiscourse.com/2010/01/24/an-exception-to-the-rule/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Pleasant Myth? &#171; GW Discourse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gwdiscourse.com/2010/01/24/an-exception-to-the-rule/#comment-751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 25, 2010 by dptrombly    Jack has a good overview of the most resilient (and for IR scholars, vexing) theories in international politics today, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 25, 2010 by dptrombly    Jack has a good overview of the most resilient (and for IR scholars, vexing) theories in international politics today, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Rozenson</title>
		<link>http://gwdiscourse.com/2010/01/24/an-exception-to-the-rule/#comment-750</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Rozenson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 04:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gwdiscourse.com/2010/01/24/an-exception-to-the-rule/#comment-750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you misrepresent the Fukuyama formulation. He maintains that democracy must and will be formed from within, not imposed from without -- Marxism as opposed to Leninism.

It&#039;s also a little disingenuous to call Russia and Pakistan democratic. Democracy is not just an election and transfer of power. By this logic we would have to call Iran democratic.

Democracy requires &lt;i&gt;at least&lt;/i&gt; the following: a free and robust news media (Russia ranks 153rd and Pakistan 159th in press freedom according to Reporters Without Borders); a system of checks on executive powers (which Russia certainly does not have and Pakistan has wrestled with vis-a-vis control over the Supreme Court); and a judiciary insulated from extortion, bribery, and prebendalism -- which is certainly not present in either country.

There&#039;s a reason Freedom House ranks both countries as beeing &quot;Not Free&quot; and that they&#039;re not included in the list of &quot;electoral democracies.&quot; Your exception to the rule is invalid, only further strengthening claim to the rule.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you misrepresent the Fukuyama formulation. He maintains that democracy must and will be formed from within, not imposed from without &#8212; Marxism as opposed to Leninism.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also a little disingenuous to call Russia and Pakistan democratic. Democracy is not just an election and transfer of power. By this logic we would have to call Iran democratic.</p>
<p>Democracy requires <i>at least</i> the following: a free and robust news media (Russia ranks 153rd and Pakistan 159th in press freedom according to Reporters Without Borders); a system of checks on executive powers (which Russia certainly does not have and Pakistan has wrestled with vis-a-vis control over the Supreme Court); and a judiciary insulated from extortion, bribery, and prebendalism &#8212; which is certainly not present in either country.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a reason Freedom House ranks both countries as beeing &#8220;Not Free&#8221; and that they&#8217;re not included in the list of &#8220;electoral democracies.&#8221; Your exception to the rule is invalid, only further strengthening claim to the rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khandzaria</title>
		<link>http://gwdiscourse.com/2010/01/24/an-exception-to-the-rule/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khandzaria]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gwdiscourse.com/2010/01/24/an-exception-to-the-rule/#comment-747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would take exception to what you said about Georgia. Since Saakashvili, independent observers agree that corruption has dropped immensely. Transparency international ranked only 5 EU countries more transparent than Georgia. 

This might be because an overwhelming majority of the country -- the figure that shows up again and again in NGO polls is something around 90% -- support Saakashvili. Why would he need to get dirty? 

Unless by &quot;Georgia&quot; you&#039;re referring  to the two breakaway states, of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, there&#039;s very limited evidence to suggest corruption in Georgia. Those who mention it refer to the Rose Revolution as a CIA plot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would take exception to what you said about Georgia. Since Saakashvili, independent observers agree that corruption has dropped immensely. Transparency international ranked only 5 EU countries more transparent than Georgia. </p>
<p>This might be because an overwhelming majority of the country &#8212; the figure that shows up again and again in NGO polls is something around 90% &#8212; support Saakashvili. Why would he need to get dirty? </p>
<p>Unless by &#8220;Georgia&#8221; you&#8217;re referring  to the two breakaway states, of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, there&#8217;s very limited evidence to suggest corruption in Georgia. Those who mention it refer to the Rose Revolution as a CIA plot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

